The table below shows the number of visits to the UK by overseas residents between 1975 and 1998.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table we are given indicates the number of visits to the UK by foreigners in five different years.
The number of visits to the UK increased about 2.7 times from 1975 (9.5 million) to 1998 (25.7 million). Visits for leisure is nearly four times as much as for business in 1975, whereas this difference is lower in all remained years. Total by North American and other residents is the same in 1998. On the other hand, the information the table gives shows the gap between North American and Western Europe visitors is 12 million in 1998, despite that this is 4 million in 1975.
Generally, the great change had taken place until 1996. By contrast, the rate of increasing grew down from 1996 and we see decreasing in the number of visiting for leasure, EU and Western European and other residents.
Finally, it is seen a non-stop inrease in the number of visitors, though the rank of increasing falls year by year and eventually, it is shown to us some decreases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-05-25 | acoldstone | 53 | view |
| 2014-09-09 | Fuzuli | 67 | view |
Visits for leisure is nearly
Visits for leisure are nearly
the information the table gives shows the gap between North American and Western Europe visitors is 12 million in 1998
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
the rate of increasing grew down from 1996
Description: what is the verb for this sentence? can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: By contrast, the rate of increasing grew down from 1996 and we see decreasing in the number of visiting for leasure, EU and Western European and other residents.
Error: leasure Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Finally, it is seen a non-stop inrease in the number of visitors, though the rank of increasing falls year by year and eventually, it is shown to us some decreases.
Error: inrease Suggestion: increase
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 172 200
No. of Characters: 771 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.621 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.483 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.794 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.425 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.705 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.186 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4