Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?
Food is supposed to be the first fundamental need for human survival. Presently, the avarice of food industries incites them to use chemicals and pesticides to maximize food production. A central question remains whether pros of using such perventatives outweigh cons or not. Here, I would like to establish it has more drawbacks than benefits.
There are manifold demerits of such elements. First and foremost, Chemicals used on foods can be detrimental for the lives of rats and squirrel as they often eat stored food for their survival. Apart from it, stomach flu, hepatitis A and skin problems are coming into existence because of using such elements. Therefore, a large proportion of people die every year which has become a worrying concern for modern generation. Adding to it, consumption of foods preserved by chemicals may cause genetic diorders.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, purity of modern foods is being deficient on account of vecious drug usage. Hence, health standard is declining radically as people are suffering from many diseases. Moreover, these substances contribute remarkably to rise cost of food products. To be specific, farmers and food authorities have to invest a massive outlay for buying expensive chemicals. Hence, they are selling edible things at higher prices. By contrast, it blesses some advantages too.
To commence with, employing chemicals nourishes foods with great protection from pests and other diseases. As a result, it not boosts productivity but also earnings of food industries. Furthermore, grains preservation can be ensured for prolonged only with existence of antidotes and chemicals. Consequently, food can be preserved for survival during emergency caused by disasters and floods.
To recapitulate, undeniably, chemicals are necessary for the safety of food. However, limiting their usage is most significant in order to care for originality and nutritions of foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-27 | Shaibal das | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Nihad | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | phanduydat | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | Jasneet | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-14 | kiranoise | 56 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism has negative implications on their countries. What is the reason for it? What can be done to change the negative attitude towards international tourism? 70
- Many university students live with their families while others need to live to live away from home because their universities are in different places.What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations? 90
- In many countries there are people with extremely high income. Some say it is good for the country, while others claim that governments should limit salaries. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- When a country develops its technology ,the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 70
- "Failure is the proof that desire was notstrong enough", To what extend do youagree with this statement? Give reasonsfor your answer? 55
Comments
plzzz recheck sir ... I have
plzzz recheck sir ... I have made corrections ....n do rate it once again ???
Well, you only added an
Well, you only added an example for caramel coloring, but overall, the essay is not exactly right on the topic. Seems you didn't read the topic carefully. You may re-write the essay.
ok but crops also are part of
ok but crops also are part of food as prsticides r used on crops such as wheat .. . I think I was write ??
The food here means 'ready
The food here means 'ready food', not crops. Maybe this confused you .
oh yeah .. but how can a
oh yeah .. but how can a writer differentiate what sort of food he is asked to ???
its totally unjustifiable
I think they should have mentioned ready food so that one can understand appropriately
what do you think sir ???
Yes, we agree with you. It
Yes, we agree with you. It should be more clear.
sir plz check now n give it
sir plz check now n give it score ... I have corrected this essay ... it will be pleasure for me n I ll be thankful to u
Still have issues for last
Still have issues for last two paragraphs. You are not asked to talk about pesticides or sprays or crops. Read the topic: the use of chemicals in food production and preservation.
now check sir .... n plz do
now check sir .... n plz do give me deserving score ....i have done a lot of hardwork on this confusing topic
7.5 out of 9 and 20 more
7.5 out of 9
and 20 more points rewarded.
tnx sir ...is it relevant now
tnx sir ...is it relevant now ... n give me sticky as well
it not boosts productivity but also earnings of food industries.
it not only boosts productivity but also gets earnings of food industries.
Sentence: A central question remains whether pros of using such perventatives outweigh cons or not.
Error: perventatives Suggestion: preventives
Sentence: Hence, usage of chemicals is deletrious for living species.
Error: deletrious Suggestion: deleterious
Sentence: Further emphasizing on my point of view, purity of modern foods is being deficient on account of vecious drug usage.
Error: vecious Suggestion: vicious
flaws:
The second paragraph is out of topic. Should be about 'in food production and preservation'.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 318 350
No. of Characters: 1688 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.223 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.308 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.796 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.826 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.061 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.244 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.465 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5