Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?
Food is supposed to be the first fundamental need for human survival. Presently, the avarice of food industries incites them to use chemicals and pesticides to maximize food production. A central question remains whether pros of using such perventatives outweigh cons or not. Here, I would like to establish it has more drawbacks than benefits.
There are manifold demerits of such elements. First and foremost, Chemicals used on foods can be detrimental for the lives of rats and squirrel as they often eat stored food for their survival. Apart from it, stomach flu, hepatitis A and skin problems are coming into existence because of using such elements. Therefore, a large proportion of people die every year which has become a worrying concern for modern generation. Adding to it, consumption of foods preserved by chemicals may cause genetic diorders.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, purity of modern foods is being deficient on account of vecious drug usage. Hence, health standard is declining radically as people are suffering from many diseases. Moreover, these substances contribute remarkably to rise cost of food products. To be specific, farmers and food authorities have to invest a massive outlay for buying expensive chemicals. Hence, they are selling edible things at higher prices. By contrast, it blesses some advantages too.
To commence with, employing chemicals nourishes foods with great protection from pests and other diseases. As a result, it not boosts productivity but also earnings of food industries. Furthermore, grains preservation can be ensured for prolonged only with existence of antidotes and chemicals. Consequently, food can be preserved for survival during emergency caused by disasters and floods.
To recapitulate, undeniably, chemicals are necessary for the safety of food. However, limiting their usage is most significant in order to care for originality and nutritions of foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-27 | Shaibal das | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Nihad | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | phanduydat | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | Jasneet | 56 | view |
| 2017-04-14 | kiranoise | 56 | view |
- These days more emphasis is being placed on university education Vocational training is not encouraged and thus there are few qualified trades people To which extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Modern technology allows machines to perform the hard work instead of humans. Does thishave a positive or a negative effect on people? Give your own opinion and examples 90
- Successful sports professional can earn a great deal more money than people in other importantprofessions. some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both and give your own opinion. 80
- Many people had been involved in sports as children but don t do any physical exercise as adults What are the reasons people avoid physical exercise How to overcome this trend and motivate to be more physically active 80
Comments
plzzz recheck sir ... I have
plzzz recheck sir ... I have made corrections ....n do rate it once again ???
Well, you only added an
Well, you only added an example for caramel coloring, but overall, the essay is not exactly right on the topic. Seems you didn't read the topic carefully. You may re-write the essay.
ok but crops also are part of
ok but crops also are part of food as prsticides r used on crops such as wheat .. . I think I was write ??
The food here means 'ready
The food here means 'ready food', not crops. Maybe this confused you .
oh yeah .. but how can a
oh yeah .. but how can a writer differentiate what sort of food he is asked to ???
its totally unjustifiable
I think they should have mentioned ready food so that one can understand appropriately
what do you think sir ???
Yes, we agree with you. It
Yes, we agree with you. It should be more clear.
sir plz check now n give it
sir plz check now n give it score ... I have corrected this essay ... it will be pleasure for me n I ll be thankful to u
Still have issues for last
Still have issues for last two paragraphs. You are not asked to talk about pesticides or sprays or crops. Read the topic: the use of chemicals in food production and preservation.
now check sir .... n plz do
now check sir .... n plz do give me deserving score ....i have done a lot of hardwork on this confusing topic
7.5 out of 9 and 20 more
7.5 out of 9
and 20 more points rewarded.
tnx sir ...is it relevant now
tnx sir ...is it relevant now ... n give me sticky as well
it not boosts productivity but also earnings of food industries.
it not only boosts productivity but also gets earnings of food industries.
Sentence: A central question remains whether pros of using such perventatives outweigh cons or not.
Error: perventatives Suggestion: preventives
Sentence: Hence, usage of chemicals is deletrious for living species.
Error: deletrious Suggestion: deleterious
Sentence: Further emphasizing on my point of view, purity of modern foods is being deficient on account of vecious drug usage.
Error: vecious Suggestion: vicious
flaws:
The second paragraph is out of topic. Should be about 'in food production and preservation'.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 318 350
No. of Characters: 1688 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.223 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.308 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.796 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.826 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.061 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.244 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.465 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.035 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5