abstract
REZKY ALFIANI (C1A115165) study Program The State administration of Faculty Social and Political Sciences Halu Oleo University with the title effectiveness of implementation of finger print attendance in improving the discipline of employee attendance at the licensing office wakatobi regency. In bombing by mr. Prof. dr. Sundi Komba, M. si, as a guide I and mr. dr. Rahman, M. si, as a mentor II.
The purpose of this research is to describe and analyze the effectiveness of the withdrawal of finger print attendance as well as describe the factors supporting and inhibiting the implementation of finger print attendance in improving the discipline of employee attendance in office licensing of wakatobi regency.
The research was conducted in the Wangi-Wangi area of wakatobi district with the research site licensing office of wakatobi regency. this research uses qualitative descriptive methods that are supported by data in the form of tables and data obtained from interviews, direct observation and documentation. The selection of information in this study by purposive sampling means that the sample withdrawal technique is subjective with specific intent or purpose with the primary data type and secondary data.
The results of this study showed that the effectiveness of the implementation of finger print attendance in improving the discipline of the attendance of the office of the wakatobi district licensing is good enough, when viewed from three aspects namely the spirit of work, showing effectiveness of application of finger print attendance to improve the discipline of employee attendance at the office licensing of wakatobi district that with the creation of an environment conducive to improve the working spirit of each employee, job valuation, Assessment done in improving the discipline of the employee attendance is to refer to the absence of attendance every day so that it can be known to anyone who is present and present daily, the motivation of work, to the memoations of the employees is to Mutual respect between superiors and subordinates, as superiors always give a good example.
Keywords: discipline attendance, effectiveness of finger print
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | hendrac15 | 11 | view |
| 2015-10-24 | saharpouya | 90 | view |
| 2015-10-24 | saharpouya | 80 | view |
- abstract 11
- in the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in this area.what do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small comm 56
- some people believe that using a bicycle as your main form of transport has a lot of advantages whereas others it has many disadvantages discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- international visitors to New Zealand: transport used during the visit 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e licensing office of wakatobi regency. this research uses qualitative descriptive m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48071216617 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19097491056 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442136498516 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 239.243948025 49.4020404114 484% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.909090909 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.