In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the grouping of students on the basis of their academic performance. Some people think that students of similar caliber should be not combined in a same classroom, while others maintain that student of similar academic standards should be grouped together. This essay will discuss that why student of similar academic competency should be grouped together.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with grouping students of similar academic grades. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that environment deeply effects the academic performace of the student. Therefore, a class of students with higher academic grades will compel the pupils to burn midnight oil and produce excellent grades to compete with their class fellows. As an example, higher grade students grouped together will seek motivation from their other classmates and out in extra efforts to maintain their standards. As a result, student’s in a competetive environment will not only produce marvellous results but also maintain excellent standards.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet of this argument is that the performance of an outshining student will start to deteriorate if grouped in a class of low graded students. As it would be quite easy for the student to score good grades with a very little effort. Hence, an outstanding student will not only utilize his skills to the best but also lower his mental aptitude. For instance, there is quite a likelihood that a bad company might astray good student from the right path. As a matter of fact, grouping good students with lower graded pupil will have drastic effect on their academic performance.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that grouping students of similar caliber would develop a competetive environment and make them stick on the right path.
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 65
- Some type of employments are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.To what extent do you agree? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experiences. 77
- conducting experiments on animals 70
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 55
Comments
Dissertation writing service…
Dissertation writing service are companies that offer assistance to students who are struggling with their dissertation projects. These services are designed to provide students with the necessary support and guidance to complete their dissertations successfully. They offer a range of services, including editing, proofreading, research, and writing assistance, to ensure that students receive the help they need to complete their dissertations on time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35785953177 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76509150519 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511705685619 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5870194212 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268389836845 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114582946846 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603946788698 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163798097248 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605088846987 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.