Recently, the phenomenon of the comparison between the actions and the loudness of words and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the advantages of speaking loudly can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the relationship between the actions and words can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the influences of speaking the actions loudly might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the advantages of speaking about actions in loud words far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will analyze that throughout this essay From a general standpoint the relationsh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icated procedures apparently can be seen Within the realm of a public arena the i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved notion of this remarkable phenomenon To conclude while there are several comp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, speaking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14720116113 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 261.0 20.5024630542 1273% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1458.0 104.977214359 1389% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 261.0 20.9669160288 1245% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 110.0 7.25397266985 1516% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129429707735 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129429707735 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802678072898 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213574362412 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 135.4 12.6369458128 1071% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -210.36 53.1260098522 -396% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.4 10.9458128079 981% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.62 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.33 8.32886699507 268% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 9.94827586207 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 106.4 10.3980295567 1023% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 10.5123152709 580% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.