Discrimination on the grounds of gender, age or some other factor can deeply impact any person. People, especially older workers, are getting discriminated in the workplace on the basis of their promotions, joining time, or being unfairly dismissed. This essay will argue that such discriminations against older workforce should be taken seriously with the consideration of making them illegal.
The older workers are the strongest pillar for any organisation. They have been working for a considerable amount of time in the company, which makes them very valuable employees. As a result, if they decide to leave the company due to the age discrimination then it could have a tremendous impact on the growth of the company. Thereby, a company should ensure strong regulations to control such kind of discrimination so as to avoid losing such a critical workforce.
In addition to this, older workers are very experienced in their work. They have a better understanding of the workflows, managing timelines and handling teams. This makes them an extremely critical resource for the efficient working of any company. Consequently, if they are being discriminated for all the hard work they have done for winning promotions, then it could directly impact their morale which could lead them to take necessary steps for leaving the organisation. Hence, making such discriminations illegal would benefit any organisation tremendously.
The older workforce is strongest, experienced and the most critical resource for any organisation. In my opinion, such qualities make them extremely valuable due to which an organisation should ensure extreme measures for regulating any kind of age discrimination in the workplace by making such incidents illegal.
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area will you choose? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- Give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn t have any effect of his bad neighbourhood 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to control such kind of discrimination so as to avoid losing such a critical workforce....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, then, as to, in addition, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47407407407 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19077029715 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1778168955 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164093447927 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621126571085 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058891921029 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124164975789 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796793387197 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.