Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon and curse for the society in general.
The importance of new technological development in recent years which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked with controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but most preponderant one stems from the fact that it helps to store and transfer information. Another aspect of this argument is that it help us for entertainment, receiving information and easily connect with people in every part of the world. Needless to say, all these merits are stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this arguments and which one certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming is that overuse of device effects on eyes and it has also adverse effect. Besides, it distract people from original goal and they do not concentrate on their work. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the boon and curse of the new technological development in recent years are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
- network of public transport. 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree Or Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 76
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in developing countries? 55
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are youngsters role model. Do you support it or not? 77
- shopping moll 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 46, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...er, there are some pitfalls that negate this arguments and which one certainly overw...
^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'distracts'?
Suggestion: distracts
...it has also adverse effect. Besides, it distract people from original goal and they do n...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25306122449 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8800076357 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595918367347 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1513231912 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146678400206 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518197066265 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103749088514 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10434115464 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109436338662 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.