car limitation

Essay topics:

car limitation

Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on car use limitations can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is irrespective of the numerous argument that exits on either sides, the citizens have to limit their use of vehicles for the benefit of the environment.

First and foremost, there are numerous reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, car use limitation will reduce carbon footprint and will reduce harmful emissions. Additionally, when people will decrease their use of cars, the environment status will be cleaner. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that governments should launch awareness campaigns to enhance their nations' knowledge about these privileges.

Secondly, another pivotal aspect of the argument is that car using limitation can boost people health, also fight many diseases. Moreover, as soon as people use eco-friendly solutions such as cycling, their blood pressure will be better. For example, as per the last study which was conducted by Oxford University, two out of four British citizens believe that using alternative methods of transportation has a dramatic influence on the environment. Consequently, it exemplifies that educationalists have to conduct extra-curricular activities to let their adolescents reap the fruits of the above beneficial points.

In conclusion, after I explained the above notions, it could be confirmed that there is equally potential evidence to support this argument, and hence my opinion is individuals should limit their use of cars and use green solutions.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-16 aymanwahab 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user aymanwahab :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les for the benefit of the environment. First and foremost, there are numerous r...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67768595041 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26421172797 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4931922046 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233901573961 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948522713972 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111072579101 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168903620291 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545503824331 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.