Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the certain kinds of music improve learning in their life. There is widespread worry that this would only lead to myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are numbers of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant is that the music is building our important daily health. The concentration and memory power improved the learning by the music. Needless to say, all this merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence are on music. Etymologically, music theory is an act of contemplation of music, from the Greek, a looking at, viewing, contemplation, speculation, theory, also a site, a spectacle. Furthermore, kids can learn teamwork as many education programs must teamwork as a part of band. Children who study the arts can learn to think creatively and this kind of education will help them to solve any problem outside the box. The people who learn music can also learn a valuable session in discipline. Music is the fabric of our society and it can shape abilities and characters.
Another pivotal aspect of aforementioned proposition is that music is fighting against the stress while the learning any boarding subject. Not only music gives enjoyment but creatively also gives learning kind of the methods. Besides, the students are creating team and Mack musical bend, It is beneficial to learn makes the team. For example, the students have stage fear will be able to boost self-confidence and build positive attitude. Hence, it is clear why many favor of music is best for learning any subjects and any field.
Within the realm of science, inappropriate education method for children might increase poor music. Moreover, fundamental aspects of explicit content of lyrics would relate to this reality that the demerits of false teaching pertain to low progress. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of youth learning is correlating negatively with poor listening habits. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of aggressive reaction against treatment.
To end, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of special music effects on children learning process far way its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of masterpiece music genre prove for kid’s life improvement, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | ashkan rafiee | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Dangar sandip M. | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | shreyanshpte | 86 | view |
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.To what extent give cause and solution 11
- Traditional subjects are moving off in recent years? Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life Agree or disagree 86
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Agree or disagree. 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Agree or disagree. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun favor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many favors'.
Suggestion: many favors
...sitive attitude. Hence, it is clear why many favor of music is best for learning any subje...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1207.87684729 180% => OK
No of words: 417.0 242.827586207 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21342925659 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 3.92707691288 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91809376756 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 139.433497537 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565947242206 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 379.143842365 177% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 12.6551724138 182% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0291803824 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5217391304 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 7.25397266985 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29873561207 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830748553305 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773451890772 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158542560708 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657042212452 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.