Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
Innovations and new ideas are very important for companies to be able to remain as a part of the competition. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that employees suggestions should be considered in companies, while other opines it is the sole responsibility of the management team. I am inclined to believe that employees suggestions must be considered by organizations. Both sides will be critiqued before the reasoned conclusion is found.
On the one hand, higher authorities should consider employees suggestions. It is a fact that people working in the particular area know the ins and outs of the processes more deeply than others. For example, a person who operates machines in production plant knows better how the efficiency of the company can be increased effectively. Furthermore, involving employees also saves money and time of the organization. Specifically, companies who involve their employees in taking decisions do not depend on experts or outsourcing which eventually save company’s resources. Moreover, the engagement of employees in decision making creates a very positive impression and inspires them to work better. The employees start feeling as part of the company and their output significantly increases.
On the other hand, people who advocate that only management should take decisions claims, employees may give advice in which they have their personal benefit, which could be harmful to the company. For instance, workers can give advice to the management to reduce the working hours. In addition, taking suggestions from everyone would only lead to chaos. If selected people are on the board of decision they can easily reach the solution without any dilemma.
To sum up, I pen down by saying that, an organization can only flourish well where its employees are given the freedom to innovate and rewarded for the same. Top level management should be smart enough to judge its plausibility of implementation, as the final decision has to be taken by them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-10 | vishal4a3 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- A successful man is not the one who has the ability to eliminate problems before they occur but the one who can face the difficulties as they arise and solve them Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of 86
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 80
- The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...from everyone would only lead to chaos. If selected people are on the board of dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31152647975 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04681816024 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1835752912 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263564648671 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759600778605 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598008939376 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144181653292 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300775272107 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.