With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?
Recently, the phenomenon of affecting technology development on artist great value and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both consequently constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that artist great value against scientist with technology development can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, encouraging musicians or painters associated with technology or science can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, people beliefs about encouraging scientist with the development of technology might increase consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume that the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the existence of the artist’s great value or science development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-28 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value for artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make the better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 77
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 88
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car owner ship? Agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87265917603 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28546618288 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4932904218 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.545454545 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27938094516 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919914887148 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086949034264 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152549110565 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610688638175 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.