different methods students to achieve information online materials
The importance of different methods students to achieve information online materials, asking teachers which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly students use online materials. Consequent, mostly student focus in online materials because online materials is very helpful all students. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that more individuals use the online material because helpful business. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that sometime, student face difficulties to understand many things they are not able to understand so that time only teacher can help the students. Besides, students cannot able to find the information discussing with classmate. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of different methods like online material are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 55 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | namdev190@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | namdev190@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | namdev190@gmail.com | view |
- large shopping malls are replacing smalls shops what is your opinion on this do you think this is a good or bad change 72
- government should reduce investment 77
- we have entered a throwaway society and fill the environment with rubbish 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 87
- the role of library 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47478991597 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75538004649 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605042016807 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8616372511 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330443795526 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102865597821 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114196842964 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18016827138 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569232324428 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.