The different methods students using to achieve information.
The different methods students to give information through online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive and negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To embark with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the online materials are very useful for every student because they can gain any information through internet. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that sometimes students cannot give information through online materials so at that time they can get knowledge from ask teachers. Needless to say, all these merits are good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that sometimes students are together and discussing with classmates. Besides, sometimes students cannot able to find online materials so at that time they can ask from their teacher. Hence, it is why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of the different methods students using to information through online materials and asking teachers or discussing with classmates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-26 | tahmeed1993 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Deepkaur123 | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41767068273 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67918747298 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550200803213 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5354619336 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143332991684 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543497316554 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690169644649 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112885363848 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685176667415 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.