The different methods students using to achieve information.
The importance of the different methods students to achieve information through online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive and negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To embark with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the online materials are very useful for every student because they can gain any information through internet. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that sometimes students cannot give information through online materials so at that time they can get knowledge from ask teachers. Needless to say, all these merits are stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that sometimes students are together and discussing with classmates. Besides, sometimes students cannot able to find the information from online materials so at that time they can ask from their teacher. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
To be conclude, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of the different methods students using to achieve information through online materials and asking teachers or discussing with classmates.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-08-05 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
2020-02-26 | tahmeed1993 | 55 | view |
2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
2020-01-27 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
2020-01-27 | Deepkaur123 | 77 | view |
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- with the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete and universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbook 77
- more information available online 77
- small shops 72
- large shopping malls are replacing the small shops. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41111111111 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77555466595 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.311995526 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173542239655 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631313682986 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867911888911 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132030338658 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887132017184 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.