Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities like skiing and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated ddebate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and concequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that every sports in all brenches can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, exiting sports such as skiing can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, dangerous sports without sufficient facilities might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of phisical exercise and sports far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or 88
- Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 85
- Does a certain type of music effect on a human? Agree / Disagree. 88
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79508196721 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24429708644 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688524590164 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3825433251 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.545454545 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462077103116 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0179873467464 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369163397171 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0274044674961 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229282049348 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.