Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Customers and producers are always in pursuit of avoiding over packaging. Some people think that it is the responsibility of the consumers to abstain from over packed products, while others maintain it solely as the responsibility of the manufacturer. This essay will discuss that why producers should avoid from over packaging a product.
To begin with, producers are always eager to launch less packed products in the market. Firstly, manufacturers are always keen and take into account various measures to reduce the amount incurred on the packing of the product. This gives them an added advantage with increase in revenues and decrease of production cost. Moreover, they also look forward for packing material that can be recycled to further lessen the cost. As an example, soft drinks bottles are being recycled by companies to increase their profits. Hence, it is quite evident that companies and manufacturers make utmost endeavours and discourage over packaging.
On the other hand, consumers also avoid buying over packed products. As the customers are well aware of high cost of over packed products, therefore most of them tend to buy products of similar nature with less packaging. Contrarily, a class of customers prefer over packaging of products for items of delicate nature. As an example, a highly sensitive electronic item / decoration piece ordered from Amazon will be over packed by the sender to ensure safe delivery to the recipient. Henceforth, customers as per their level of ease are more attracted towards less packed products.
In conclusion, over packed products are discouraged and do not prove beneficial either for the consumer or the producer. This essay has discussed that owing to high production and cost issues producers are responsible to avoid over packaging of products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 55
- Some people spend too much time on work than their personal/private life and experience time shortage. What problems does it cause. 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 72
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32291666667 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79213669909 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3966558729 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319162619514 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118376140975 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774254594768 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23165029342 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749215075644 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.