Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package products in the first place?
Choose which side you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences,
observations or reading.
Over-packaging
Since the beginning of the 21st century, most producers have focused more and more on packaging their products. Some people believe that over-packaging is compulsory and producers should package their products to protect them from the outside environment, while others argue that over-packaging has led to dramatic increase in the prices of the products. This essay will discuss the reasons why over-packaging is responsible of the producers and it should not affect on the prices of the products.
Producers shall deliver their products in the form which reach to the consumers without any damages. Over-packaging is the right solution to protect products from any types of deterioration. For example, most of food these days are transferred over the seas, and the best method to preserve them is through over-packaging. Therefore, it seems clear that over packaging is essential and it must be imposed on the producers.
On the other hand, some people think that over-packaging of the products has led to significant rise of the prices. Using additional packaging means paying additional costs. Recent research, which was conducted in USA, has shown that over-packaging of the products leads to increment in prices more that 70% of the original price. But these people are unaware of the fact that over- packaging is necessary for protecting the products from any external detrimental impacts. Thus, over-packaging is very important and it is function of the producers.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why over-packaging is crucial and producers must preform it within their duties. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that over-packaging is essential and must be done by the producers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-24 | halbouni1984 | 72 | view |
| 2018-02-24 | halbouni1984 | 72 | view |
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places How do you think this has changed the way we work Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology 86
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 72
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believes that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. 70
- Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way? 72
- Illiterate parents cannot teach their children well, a laborer’s child cannot become a doctor, what are your views regarding this. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Over-packaging Since the beginning of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ible of the producers and it should not affect on the prices of the products. Producer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tial and must be done by the producers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38602941176 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15755319716 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496323529412 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4951377771 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347513333698 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144265366295 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047421785587 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247768818184 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480347972811 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.