Undoubtedly, at present, it is an irrefutable fact that more people incline to engage in extreme sports; however, there are major risks associated with it. In this essay, I shall be analysing both positive and negative impacts of extreme sports followed by a rational conclusion.
Primarily, there are several reasons why more people tend to take risk and one of them is purely for the thrill. Apart from that, age, financial status and self-esteem fuel to take a risk in extreme sports. With respect to an article published by Harvard University on sports, it is revealed that more youth are thrill seekers and willing to risk their lives without even knowing about it. Another argument is that, it is merely for the people who post their achievements on social media.
Thus, some would argue person’s life is more important than just a sport. Some would argue it should only be tried under supervision and as a group. Also, others suggest that it needs to be done with a guidance of a professional establishment. Whichever the case, it is better to be safer than sorry.
While there are strong arguments to support both sides of the case, my opinion is that people should identify what is more important to them: fame, thrill, family or their precious life.
- With the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 85
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 85
- What do you think is the most important invention for the past 100 years，antibiotics, airplane, or computers? And why? 77
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 80
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, it is better to be safer than sorry. While there are strong arguments to supp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, apart from, what is more, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60399279255 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634259259259 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4840405437 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100034114816 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414255299393 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364658228169 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628312765982 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407240449173 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.