Do you think that place where the person grew up has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain with examples.
Recently the phenomenon of environmental influences in one's accomplishments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that neighbourhood impacts are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that society and places can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a societal standpoint, places that people grow there can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that behaviours, as well as their character, inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered diverse traits. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both human being and every person's lifestyle apparently can be seen.
within the realm of psychological science, the environmental circumstances might increase the consequences of better society. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of high qualified and openminded people related to this reality that goals pertain one's efforts in their lives. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of persuading aims is correlated negatively with friends and places where we spend our time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of universities and school's situations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving the society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of enhancing culture prove the significance of well-educated people, but also pinpoint goals implications
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-02-04 | Mahdi_Farhani | 78 | view |
2017-08-31 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 83 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 11
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...enomenon of environmental influences in ones accomplishments and its corresponding i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...fications of both human being and every persons lifestyle apparently can be seen. with...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...sons lifestyle apparently can be seen. within the realm of psychological science, the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ated to this reality that goals pertain ones efforts in their lives. As a tangible e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, but also pinpoint goals implications
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71264367816 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32635019627 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4812156876 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122723164889 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033870835972 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349100166349 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596784951266 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254533029143 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.