E-books replacing libraries

Essay topics:

E-books replacing libraries

Ever since the twenty-first century took place, there has been a seismic shift in the debate of using hard copies instead of books. Certain scientific studies and theoretical approaches have confirmed those E-books are highly rewarding for our society, while other argues that there are several loopholes. this point of contention is described hereunder to form a stance.
To set the wheels in motion, there are multiple glarious and reinforced rich rewards of using online books instead of traditional hard copies, which act as its avid proponents. Firstly, the most evident and distinctive one stems from the fact that these digital soft copies are very cost-effective and pocket friendly, unless traditional hardcopies. Secondly, another underlying, salient and remarkable feature is that these are navigable and portable and a person can easily carried it anywhere, unlike bulky books. Moreover, it can also decline deforestation because there is no usage of paper and pencil as it is electronic.
What prompts the cynics to contradict is the fact that there are several issues associated with this trend. Firstly, the most predominant concern is that user feels uncomfortable while constantly watch its LED screen because it puts strain on eyes and headache as well as vision problems can occur. Secondly, it is worth pointing out that due to technological error, person can lost its favourable books. Additionally, not every book can present online like books in libraries.
In the nutshell, as every rose has some thorns on its stem, similarly, e-books are highly rewarding for our society has no exception. It may prove productive and counter productive. But it can not replace libraries at all.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-24 Reet Bhullar 55 view
2019-01-16 bnnu 88 view
2018-06-22 1987khil 61 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bnnu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rgues that there are several loopholes. this point of contention is described hereun...
^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'carry'
Suggestion: carry
...le and portable and a person can easily carried it anywhere, unlike bulky books. Moreov...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30627306273 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81551024551 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634686346863 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9193943427 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166388218 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569382650395 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10150549453 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10393579152 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851095453767 0.0609392437508 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.