In the education system, assessment through formal examination are still valid.
The importance of students’ assessment through written examination, which has always been debated, has now more controversial. The substantial influence of formal written examination has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this tend on the way of assessing students’ knowledge in recent years. It can be agreed that end of year exam has some positive aspects but some people claim that it also has some negative effects. This essay will elaborate upon how written examination benefits to student’s future, practical knowledge, and higher level of remembering skill and thus, lead to logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why formal written examinations are necessary to assess students but the most important one lies from the fact that written assessments help to improve students’ writing and memorising skills which will help to gain benefits in future such as professional jobs. For example, international studies have repeatedly shown that students with good writing skill can easily make good impression at their workplace. Therefore, students need to be assessed by the written examination.
On the contrary, some people have adopted an opposing view that it doesn’t a reflect the true abilities of students as their hard work of their whole year depends on a single day’s performance. One day exam could be affected by any domestic problems, illness or stress. As an illustration, a talented student may not be able to perform up to the mark in the examination as it changes the ability of the student due to extra stress and working under pressure’ according to a startling new research. Thus, students should be evaluated by as set of different methods rather than only written examination.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that formal written examination can be more prominent although it has a number of drawbacks that should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e assessed by the written examination. On the contrary, some people have adopte...
^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d an opposing view that it doesn't a reflect the true abilities of students as their...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41639344262 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09581125056 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5567687302 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118236253407 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495174081818 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051058682821 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802105935629 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411718901768 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.