Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Effective learning requires time, comfort, peace and it is impossible to combine study and employment was always a controversial topic. Many people believe that learning requires proper concentration and time to learn anything effectively. Others reject this notion and claim that it varies from person to person and it totally depends on individuals how they balance their professional life and study. In my opinion, if a working employee wants to study, he or she will manage his professional career and takes some time for studies. This essay would further elaborate both sides with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, learning requires proper concentration and time to grasp new technologies and new subjects. Students who do not work can entirely concentrate on studies and can grasp the content and gain full knowledge of the subject with peace, comfort. For example, a student appearing for exams need to attend college daily and prepare well for the exam, need to spend a considerable amount of time while preparing for examinations. This example clearly explains us studies require a good amount of time to learn the subject. Employment targets woes to students and makes them stressed.
On the other hand, people believe there are many people who maintain their work-life balance while studying. For example, many software employees pursuing distance education and in recent time this has become very popular. This example exemplifies it depends on the individuals how they are able to balance their work and learning.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that it is fully dependent on the workers how to maintain a personal life and learning life while opting for distance education or higher education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one s career To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn’t have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 86
- Workers and nurses should be paid more? what is your opinion? 80
- Does a certain type of music affect young children s learning Agree Disagree 49
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 8.36945812808 227% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29616724739 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81511107569 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0110316421 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195174816123 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762342910126 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948927067655 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106118990616 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850421158798 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.