Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.

Submitted by prabh2015 on Fri, 05/25/2018 - 23:07

The effect of deducting marks for late submission of assignment which was always debatable has now become an unprecedented controversy. The substantial influence of marks deduction has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on students in recent years. Some people claim that it makes the students more disciplined and inculcates the habit of time management among them while others believe that it can demoralise the students. The following essay will delineate the pros and cons of score deduction of for late assignment submission before deducing a logical conclusion.

At the very outset, there are numerous arguments in support of following a strict deadline for the submission of various assignments, but the most preponderant is that it makes students more disciplined. To illustrate this point, nowadays students are becoming careless for their studies but if there would be any penalty then they will be more serious towards it. Moreover, learners can get the habit of managing their time wisely for their future life. Thus, marks deduction plays a vital role in making a child more disciplined and punctual.

On the other hand, opponents of the view stated above may defend that, cutting marks from assignment may demoralise the students, and they will become stubborn. Although it is partially true that it demotivates the students, it is almost impossible to eliminate penalties from the education system.

Eventually, according to what has been discussed above, I strongly concede that despite some drawbacks the benefits of the marks reduction for the late submission of assignment cannot be ignored.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the view stated above may defend that, cutting marks from assignment may demora...
^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'marks'' or 'mark's'?
Suggestion: marks'; mark's
...pite some drawbacks the benefits of the marks reduction for the late submission of as...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41634241245 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85224889776 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1861636969 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525137613008 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.020401242577 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161104031825 0.071462118173 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0320087940919 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118529590109 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.