Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Comfort, time and internal peace are required to make learning efficient. Hence, it is not possible to do job and study side by side. Occupation and education disturb one another. I strongly oppose this statement because handling both these together is easily possible with strong willpower. I will elaborate points to support my opinion in the further paragraphs.
Firstly, there are a lot of people in western countries, who do a part-time study and work full-time or vice-versa. It all depends on the preference of the individuals. If they want to bear some hassle and become more productive in ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-21 | joyspacechou0130 | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Ajay naher | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | sunilkms | 77 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | ajayvermaETP | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate (eliminate) this? 77
- Some people think that Books are losing as a source of information and entertainment Do you agree or disagree 66
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Experience is the more effective way to teach compared to the books Agree or disagree 57
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16494845361 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77599002473 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4156114188 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1052631579 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151835422237 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505506972186 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461061816284 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941837204842 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062004076617 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.