Recently, the phenomenon of study and employment combination and its effect on efficacious learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''Does the combination of education and occupation distract the individuals from effective learning?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that effective learning happens in a relaxed atmosphere and its combination with employment could be harmful educationally, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, efficient learning is bound up inextricably with a relaxed lifestyle, which indicates they lead to both educational success and better academic marks. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between focused students and educational improvements as well as an exponential increase in creativity toward learning. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of efficient education is correlated positively with not only peaceful and concentrated learners but also skillful professionals for future jobs.
Within the realm of occupation, without the slightest doubt, skillful professionals for future jobs attribute to peaceful and concentrated learners, in that it would come down to success, educational improvement, and good marks. A salient example of such attribution is the student job prohibition, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take academic life for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint occupational problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of relaxed and focused academic life in increasing future occupational opportunities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that effective learning happens in a relaxed atmosphere and its combination with employment could be harmful educationally.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 80
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to boos, agree or disagree? 79
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 55
- More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90333333333 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35203255089 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5209666058 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.1 104.977214359 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150897033354 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564125275974 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665145096241 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099425025828 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771971969832 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 12.6369458128 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.65 53.1260098522 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.54236453202 243% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.9458128079 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 9.94827586207 231% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 10.5123152709 219% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.