Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of combining the job with education has been a debatable topic across the globe. It is undeniable to say that people can only do the job or can do effective learning at a time. Some critics argue that one can only stay focused in one field while others are in favor of learning effectively with the job. In this essay, I will discuss how it is not possible to join studies with employment.
To begin with, in this competitive world the education has become so expensive that one can never assume without having a source of earning to pay the fees. For instance, students take study loans from banks to go abroad for higher studies and they get involved in some part-time job to repay the loans. They have no other option except earning money to finish up the loan amount. In addition to this, they try to be focused towards their goals and try hard to achieve them.
On the other hand, proponents claim that effective learning is only possible when you have peace of mind. Moreover, they believe that people cannot be more focused while doing the job as learning something needs a deep concentration that is not possible with work. For example, one will always feel exhausted while doing any kind of work resulting in less productivity.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that to learn effectively demands a lot of dedication and focus which cannot be attained with the job. So people can get easily distracted in studies while doing any work for earning.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. What is your opinion? 70
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 55
- How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 72
- which is better experiential learning or traditional learning ? give your opinion. 77
- Employers Authorities of a company should take suggestions or ideas from employees in taking any decision To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71320754717 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45470465386 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7233795175 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225979414585 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837136614635 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462679219238 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146366828959 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395671843848 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.