Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that new generation of a country is trying to be like some film stars or successful sports stars. There is widespread worry and this will only lead to a myriad of concern among youngsters as they will imitate them blindly that may affect them badly. Some people think that the young generation should follow the footsteps of film stars or sportspersons while others claim that it will be dangerous. In this essay, I will discuss the merits and demerits of considering film stars or sports stars as their role model.
To commence with, our young generation is becoming more attracted towards the lavish lifestyle of film stars or successful sports stars as they start to imitate them blindly. In addition to this, they start considering them as God and get indulge in those activities as film stars do. For example, some youngsters start smoking just because their favorite film star smokes and even in the same style. Furthermore, the new generation gets involved in taking drugs or start doing some notorious activities by
following their role models.
On the contrary, Some celebrities also give inspiration to others by doing more and more charity work or by opening NGO to help needy people. This can be motivation for youngsters to do such kind of work which will be helpful for them and others. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar is a role model for the new generation as he has been known for such kind of charity work.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that there is no harm for youngsters to follow their role models but it must be with a limitation so that it does not impact them in a negative way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | dilroop | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | surinder bakipuria | 55 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | andrefreitas | 72 | view |
- Whether experimental learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education, Agree or Disagree? 77
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women,' To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 72
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 55
- which is better experiential learning or traditional learning ? give your opinion. 77
- Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. What is your opinion? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 189, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...itation so that it does not impact them in a negative way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74915254237 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52965406126 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3670142948 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.75 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315675507763 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130807175068 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871538222007 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15659823758 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769323354664 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.1260098522 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.