Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of studying and working at the same time and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this issue is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be minus as it could have some catastrophic effects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why going to work at the aducational time is disadvantageous. These demerits are rooted in the fact of ineffectiveness. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discoverd these destrictions. Firstly, each of these issues including studying or employment needs adequate concentration in order to have ample efficiency and productivity. Furthermore, the devoted time for each of them should be sufficient, because they need their own energy and time to spend.
In addition, doing both studying and working together may lead to some unhealthy circumstances including increasing stress. Moreover, it is ocasionally impossible to do these issues at the same time, due to occurre some overlaps between them. Hence, balancing time and energy for doing both of them is quite difficult and need extra time, money and energy.
In conclusion, while there are several reasons to justify have a job during studying, I profoundly believe that it can have some detrimental impacts on dwellers' life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree? 80
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extentdo you agree with this statement? 11
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed their own energy and time to spend. In addition, doing both studying and wor...
^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dwellers'' or 'dweller's'?
Suggestion: dwellers'; dweller's
...it can have some detrimental impacts on dwellers life.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38818565401 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19039242981 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62447257384 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6458251889 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121769034224 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439850073965 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314156342334 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662915485173 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442729592061 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.