Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of environment is too alarming to be managed individuals and real change can be made at the government level, which has always been debatable, has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become more controversial. the substantial influence imitating celebrities has sparked the controversy over the potential integral part of the society in recent years. It can be upside the imitating celebrities are instrumental indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. the essay will be elaborate in both side and will provide a well weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why imitating celebrities is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact individual can manage environment pollution it they can understand their own responsibilities and also perform it honestly and the government also can change it because government can make strong rule to save our environment. Who break this rule then court can punished with him heavy fines. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the topic for the amelioration of society.
However, it has some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the topic? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. hence, it is apparent the downside of the topic cannot be overlooked.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the topic. While it is evident that it has various benefits, although its deleterious effects cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | madhutalaari@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- Environment pollution 77
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 55
- In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. to what extent do you agree and disagree. 65
- Can money bring happiness 61
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forword to decrease this issue? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...hich has always been debatable, has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... thus it has become more controversial. the substantial influence imitating celebri...
^^^
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... it has some various drawbacks as well. the essay will be elaborate in both side an...
^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ke strong rule to save our environment. Who break this rule then court can punished...
^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...s rooted in the fact that disadvantage. hence, it is apparent the downside of the top...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, honestly, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4046692607 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24839575401 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614785992218 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.3002523388 50.4703680194 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292103229522 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744375717189 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104819924563 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142899824197 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100517332834 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.