Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?

Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on government expenditures in arts, music and recreational works can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My opinion is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I have mixed thoughts on both sides.

There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, government has to fund the projects related to arts, music and entertainment, and it is mandatory for any community mental development. It is important to note that when any country has several reputable museums for art works and national music, county`s culture is kept secure from demolishing due to the high globalization trend. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that investing in such works is imperative for culture existence.

As every coin has two sides, Major funds consideration on other facilities is vital. First and foremost, governments should focus on other country`s facilities such as healthcare, education and infrastructure, because these are fundamental sources of nation`s development. This exemplifies that other facilities take precedence.

In conclusion, I see that there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that investment in arts, music and painting is important, but other country`s facilities play a pivotal rule in country`s progress.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 manraj123 70 view
2020-01-29 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2020-01-29 manraj123 55 view
2020-01-28 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-27 Alireza.r.68 88 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istence. As every coin has two sides, Major funds consideration on other facil...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts should focus on other country's facilities such as healthcare, education...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72018348624 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5252674098 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7510885521 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.7 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147665710036 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509229636261 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502992219875 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085521624694 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232083501063 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.