Recently, there is a phenomenon that government should reduce investment in arts, music and painting has sparked heated debate. Some feel that the government should continue such investment while others feel that other industries may require this money much more. I am inclined to believe that the notion should be rejected and will elaborate why the government should sustain the investment in arts, music and painting before arriving at a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, the main reason behind the debate would be the shrinking national financial budget and the increasing demand for this funds from various sectors. However, this fund is always limited and many people feel that education and healthcare should get priority over the rest. Undoubtedly, in order to ensure the future of a nation, the people need to be educated. Similarly, the country would need healthy people in order to be able to thrive hence people argue that it is crucial that this industry gets the most investment.
On the contrary, art plays a pivotal role in the development of a successful nation driven by happy people. Indubitably, a country without arts would only be a money generating society. Economist have asserted that the happiness index is a better measure of a country's success and that arts would be able to foster such well-being in the people. Evidently, this reinforces the fact that the government should not reduce their investment in fine arts.
According to the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that fine arts not only can help develop future talents but also has been proven to achieve a high happiness index and thus a successful country. In a nutshell, the benefits of continuous investment in the arts from the government far outweighs the potential drawbacks.
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. 80
- The World is becoming a forest of the building. It is becoming difficult to find trees everywhere. What is the main reason for the global warming? Can you suggest ways, to eradicate global warming? 80
- What do you think are the strengths and weakness of the education system in your country Use your own experience to support your idea 90
- Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree / Disagree ? 88
- Do you think card less society is realistic and why? what are the advantages and disadvantages 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...al budget and the increasing demand for this funds from various sectors. However, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, similarly, so, thus, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17931034483 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.738625813 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7525421378 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236112902725 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997305696319 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143148914983 0.071462118173 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141182626532 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131372524635 0.0609392437508 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.