How does the design of buildings, where people work and live,
Affect them either positively or negatively
The design of buildings has a huge impact on the individuals who
work and live with them, both negatively and positively. A well-
designed building can enhance the people's well-being, productivity,
and overall quality of life. With the poorly designed building can
lead to discomfort, various health and safety issues. Hereby, I say that
design of buildings can affect the people who work and live there and also
explain the positive and negative aspects of design of buildings in the following
paragraph.
Firstly, the positive effects of building design and well designed
space such as ventilation, noise control can enhance the productivity
of the employees. Buildings designed with an comfort can have impact on
social and mental well-being. Proper ventilation and pollution control in
a building can give comfort, space for relaxation and also improve physical
activity. Buildings which provide health and safety significantly help for occupants .
Thoughtful design features such as fit and easy navigation, emergency exists
Promote safety and minimize accident control.
Secondly, the negative aspects of poorly designed buildings lacking of
Comfort factors and lead to physical discomfort including stress, back pain.
Inadequate ventilation and increase in temperature inside a building can affect
the productivity of an employee and also responsible for stress, and reduce focus
in work. It also leads to employers frustration. Employers may try to change spaces
for their comfort can lead to less productivity and increased stress. The poor design
buildings with inadequate safety measures or lack of emergency exists can lead to
employee safety.
In a nutshell, I pen down saying that design of buildings paly a crucial role in shaping
fine experience for employee’s and well-being of an individual. A well design building only
provide comfort, safety to the individuals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-11 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 55 | view |
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 56
- Mass media such as TV radio and newspaper has become an essential part of our everyday lives How correct is this statement in your opinion Explain your point of view with the help of suitable arguments and examples 72
- How does the design of buildings where people work and live Affect them either positively or negatively 55
- write about any recent invention that you think proved beneficial Or detrimental to society 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 43, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the employees. Buildings designed with an comfort can have impact on social and ...
^^
Line 15, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... safety significantly help for occupants . Thoughtful design features such as fit...
^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
.... Employers may try to change spaces for their comfort can lead to less producti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 8.36945812808 251% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73010380623 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9621151295 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505190311419 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7342205775 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.12807881773 606% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283264208994 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11208594824 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10498450274 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965819560602 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101453656071 0.0609392437508 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.