Imitating in sports and movies good or bad.
The /iscussion on imitating in sports and movies good or bad is a debatable thain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriakld of reasons which will further explain of this argument but the most preponderant one stems of the fact is that now days many movies or sports team is increasing time by time which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports and movies more important in human life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainty overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is thjatd drug with of more bad effects on children. Besides, children do some copy which movies in do actor which is very bad. Hence, it is apparent why many
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-22 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | rejeesh | 49 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | gobindh Singh | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Sinabri | 80 | view |
- Machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is no prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- discuss whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life & work. 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development. To what extent do you agree? 77
- Technological access to online music should be free or paid what do you think? 55
- Any recent invention that you think proved beneficial or determined to society. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand ...
^^
Line 9, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very bad. Hence, it is apparent why many
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 1207.87684729 70% => OK
No of words: 178.0 242.827586207 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74719101124 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.92707691288 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40992246705 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 139.433497537 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 379.143842365 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.4977167375 50.4703680194 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311665757663 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130823678795 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159073121638 0.071462118173 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20408655906 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842169411746 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 55.0591133005 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.