With the increases of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
The importance of digital media, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of digital media has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on whole students in recent years. It can be agreed that digital media play a vital role, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how digital media can save natural resources and how e-books require extra hardware money, and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the universities should be procured digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that digital media save natural resources, which directly influences the environment of the world. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that deforestation in China have dramatically decreased five times compared with four years ago after digital media has been introduced to students. Therefore, digital media should be used more frequently rather than updating textbooks for universities.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that digital media also has some disadvantages as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that e-books require hardware which costs money. For instance, the Hong Kong university spends more than five million dollars to update the hardware of e-books in order to offer comprehensive digital media to students for their study.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, I think it can be concluded that the impact of digital media on students is prominent, although the tradition textbooks should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | ardalan1984 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ardalan1984 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | ardalan1984 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | silky | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons/ or your personal experience. 80
- Some universities deduct students work if assignment is given late What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions 48
- In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Is it realistic to combine them at the same time? Support your opin 85
- There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash It seems that cashless society is becoming a reality How realistic do you think it is And do you think it brings benefits or problems 84
- Some people think that the design of buildings has affect, either positively or negatively, on where people work and live. To what extent you agree or disagree. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow e-books require extra hardware money, and thus lead to a logical conclusion. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46007604563 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85240549212 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0399871051 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377779232278 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160402845012 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662992110271 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219821473159 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873941678906 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.