As cities expanding, some people claim government should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building More roads for vehicle owning population. What is your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
There is no doubt that people want the fastest and convenient transportation in recent days. Some people believe that the government should be creating better networks of public transportation, whereas others think that the government should be building more roads for vehicle owning population. In my opinion, I strongly believe that a better networks of public transportation are better than building roads, which can be supported by the reasons as follows.
The first and important reason of this argument is that using public transportation can decrease air pollution for a city. To more specific, public transportation always uses electronic energy and decrease the emission of carbon dioxide. For example, this can be established by a recent study by Preston University which founded that 76% of people think an efficient public transportation system is good for air quality.
Secondly, people don’t worry about traffic jams when they take public transportation, such as the subway and train. In other words, the traffic problems will be improved if people are more likely to choose public transportations as fewer private cars are on the road. For example, with the improvement of the public transportations system in Beijing, which directly decreased 60% of traffic jams rate in this city. In this regard, more and more people are willing to choose to take public transportation rather than private cars.
In conclusion, with all the points above, I think the government needs creating a good public transportation system rather than building more roads. In this regard, it is important that governments should devote funding and improve the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim government should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building More roads for vehicle owning population. What is your opinion? Give some examples or exper 62
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 55
- Some point that experiential learning ( ie. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others thinks a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 85
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause 81
- In less developed countries, are the disadvantages form tourism as great as the advantages? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...ple, with the improvement of the public transportations system in Beijing, which directly decre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...system rather than building more roads. In this regard, it is important that gover...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41762452107 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03046485033 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2966931572 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.833333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351252298268 0.242375264174 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136405774299 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980379216379 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225329782523 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096773131254 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.