Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the influence of information revolution on mass communication has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are its positive and negative consequences”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the mass communication has various effects on individual lives and the society in recent years, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the communicative standpoint, effective communication is bound up inextricably with the Internet infrastructures, which indicate they lead to both social interaction and keeping updated. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between information technology and social networking as well as an exponential increase in online broadcasting. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to isolation, being introvert, privacy invasion, and cybercrimes alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of strengthening human relationship is correlated positively with not only ubiquity of the Internet but also modern telecommunication services.
Within the realm of science and technology, without the slightest doubt, technological advancements attribute to information sharing, in that it would come down to computer networking, data transmission, and digital electronic equipment. A salient example of such attribution is medical aid, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take technical education for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint artificial intelligence problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to online educational materials, e-library, and even online coaching. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of digital technology in interpersonal communication.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that revolutionized information and mass communication are influential on the society in many ways. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-29 | Basil3241 | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | shivek | 100 | view |
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- When you are at the end of your rope, tie a knot, and hold on. How far do you agree with Theodore Roosevelt quote? 88
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 88
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to develop countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in develop countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1207.87684729 170% => OK
No of words: 335.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11641791045 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63307741504 2.71678728327 134% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 139.433497537 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 379.143842365 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8522251375 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212117381494 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509192543216 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606732088442 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123197281349 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720285347312 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.51 11.5310837438 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 55.0591133005 252% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.