Internet is not considered good for young people due to the fact that internet has damaged the communication and relationship formation in younger generation. I agree with this notion and this essay will explain how internet has worked as impediment in communication and relationships in teenagers.
At the outset, Internet has given teenagers a platform to exchange ideas with people across the global which has helped younger generation to participate in discourse but what has suffered tremendously is the formal means of communication. Teenagers have started using short forms of a word and jargon in their daily conversation which permeates to their formal communication means like formal writing, speaking. To cite an example, we can see very often people using "u" in place of "You". Therefore, internet has certainly degraded the level of formal communication in new generations.
Another deleterious effect of internet is how weak social bonding has become in younger generation which is irony because social sites on internet are meant to bridge the gap among people. Teenagers are in contact with people who is in other parts of the world; however these group of people have not strengthened the bonds in local community. They hardly know their relatives, well-wishers of their family because they are involved too much in virtual world. Hence, relationships has suffered a lot due to advent of internet.
In conclusion, after analyzing arguments in details, It can be said that internet has some serious implication in communication and relationships which should be dealt wisely.
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 77
- Organizations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both 74
- Is it better to be a good listener or good talker? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 72
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write , but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46215139442 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14643184144 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589641434263 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1405494766 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186854366132 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674016216928 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388944269378 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104632088905 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572392094107 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.