It is important for children to study cultural courses like film/movie/video gaming at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying cultural courses and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of video gaming is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that portraying films can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning literature can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of motivated students, as well as modern teaching methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of teaching cultural courses like film, movies, and video games. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both practical courses and well-educated teachers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, watching movies at school might increase the consequences of old teachers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of unfacilitated schools would relate to this reality that the demerits of useless video projectors pertain to online courses. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of out-door games is correlated negatively with lazy students. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of traditional teaching methods.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching cultural lessons far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern universities prove the significance of the educational curriculum, but also pinpoint educational development implications.
- For governments and organizations, what is a critical global problem and what is thesolution? 11
- Should the government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 88
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems.What are the underlying causes? 11
- More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78947368421 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22502931231 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676691729323 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4921561389 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184729529435 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548889521411 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462984028967 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923112268228 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420058177676 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.