It is important for children to study a film a school to learn literature. To what extent tou are agree or disagree.
The importance for children to study a film at school to learn literature which was always debate has now become more controversial with many people claiming that is beneficial while other some people reject this notion. The substantial influences has sparked the controversy over potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, former proposition appers to be more rational. This essay will further explain in both side views and lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad reasons to further explain arguments one the most preponderant stems can benefit for history arts makes students aware of the traditions, culture , rituals and life style of people bygone centuries. For instances Shakespeare is not famous dramatist in the 16th century but now is famous playwright. The literature teach the younger students to travel in right path and avoid wrong customs.
Elaborating my viewpoints, studying dramas career s considered as sheer wastage of the energy. In the fast growing world, youngsters are required to pay attention towards in modern science and technologies. Furthermore, dramas, tragic , romantic plays of old days distract old generation minds.
According to aforementioned above, it is drawn that studying literature in schools and colleges is not beneficial for students growth. A attention to modern development and innovations instead of old play dramas.
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life 77
- some people think the advertisement is bad 77
- Some people think that university should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses T what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work. 77
- students choose university 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...this notion. The substantial influences has sparked the controversy over potential ...
^^^
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essay will further explain in both side views and lead to logical conclusion. ...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erant stems can benefit for history arts makes students aware of the traditions, ...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tudents aware of the traditions, culture , rituals and life style of people bygone...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...ow is famous playwright. The literature teach the younger students to travel in righ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure teach the younger students to travel in right path and avoid wrong customs. ...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...echnologies. Furthermore, dramas, tragic , romantic plays of old days distract old...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
... is not beneficial for students growth. A attention to modern development and inn...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53301886792 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94045560263 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702830188679 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5913859007 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188854941547 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512866180335 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813772213604 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100894147807 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595207215796 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.