In this day and age, it is irrefutable to say that books and formal education play an important role in everyone’s life. To a certain extent, I agree that formal education and books are the pillars of someone’s future. However, I also believe that life experience is a better teacher. This essay shall meticulously delineate my opinion by analyzing both sides of the argument.
From the educational standpoint, books are inextricably bound up with knowledge, which indicates they lead to both skill and case-study. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between subjects and performance indicator, as well as an exponential increase in confidence. Researcher, nevertheless, paid heed to the classroom and school. Consequently, my empirical evidence thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of formal education correlated positively with not only curriculum but also technical skills.
Within the realm of experience, without the slightest doubt, real-life problems attribute to behavior, in that it would come down to challenges, strength, and belief. A salient example of such attribution is practical experience, which is a cause for concern since it was taken practical experiences for granted. Had been there a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint learning problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to dealings and observations. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of practical experience.
In conclusion, while the foregoing discussion propounds the view that there are substantial arguments on both sides of the case, I believe that formal education and books are more important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...attention to dealings and observations. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66037735849 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27064682463 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7931291834 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268005441468 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794628922549 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093691370248 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155341806606 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118080904342 0.0609392437508 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.