In today's world, parents in different regions are provided with a selection of types of schools, single-sex or double sex, to choose which is suitable for their children to send in. Some of them believe that single-sex schools drawbacks outweigh its advantages when it comes to the student's future life. I strongly support this idea.
On one side, parents who encourage their offspring to go to single-sex schools might argue that they will have more concentration on lessons rather than being distracted by their instincts needs such as having a relationship with the opposite gender. Of the top of this argument, they mention that when all person around is in the same sex, students will solely focus on what the teachers are educating and they gain the whole knowledge. Moreover, parents, on the other side, would be much less worried about their children's sex life when they have been put in same-sex schools. A father will not worry about his girl getting a close relationship with a boy which may lead to sexual activity. For some, it is a great matter of concern.
Conversely, some others side with multi-sex schools as they provide more advantages for children's upcoming life. They firmly believe that if students are separated in schools, they will not have the chance to get to know the other sex gender world and it would definitely spark to lack of mutual understanding among opposite sex genders. More than that, children who have been put in single-sex schools might find it hard to communicate with people from the other sex group. To exemplify this, a boy who has spent most of his time with other boys will find it hard to make a relationship with girls as these two sex groups have different desires and tendencies which might not be known by the boy. Overall, through experiencing living with other sex group people will gain some valuable communication knowledge which is necessary for their future life.
Despite the fact that single-sex schools have some mere benefits, I strongly side with double-sex schools, as a result, as they develop people a common understanding of the other group and might result in less sex discrimination, family troubles, and better work environment which are great parts of every adult's life. This is because, nowadays, men and women are working and living shoulder to shoulder so they must be provided with a chance to know each other beforehand. The schools, in this regard, would be their best chance.
- In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single sex schools or co educational schools Some people think that children going to single sex schools have disadvantages later in life To what extent do you agree 85
- In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single sex school or co educational schools Some people think that children going to single sex schools have disadvantages later in life To what extent do you agree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some, it is a great matter of concern. Conversely, some others side with multi-...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...ironment which are great parts of every adults life. This is because, nowadays, men an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, may, moreover, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 31.9359605911 182% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1207.87684729 169% => OK
No of words: 415.0 242.827586207 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93253012048 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 3.92707691288 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59975768492 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 379.143842365 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.072360926 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306464685446 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11803515871 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955159336835 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230755723919 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624478725077 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some, it is a great matter of concern. Conversely, some others side with multi-...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...ironment which are great parts of every adults life. This is because, nowadays, men an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, may, moreover, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 31.9359605911 182% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1207.87684729 169% => OK
No of words: 415.0 242.827586207 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93253012048 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 3.92707691288 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59975768492 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503614457831 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 379.143842365 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.072360926 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306464685446 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11803515871 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955159336835 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230755723919 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624478725077 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.