Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree?
With the advent and extensive use of the Internet, social networking has become a subject of considerable controversy. Despite the widely supported opinion that social networking sites are the best solution for facilitating the communication of people around the world, this essay will prove that due to the threat of addiction and security gaps, these websites negatively affect both society as a whole and its members.
To begin with, the transition of human interaction to the digital world is undoubtedly changing the rules of social communication at a tremendous pace. Generally, it is the best way to track the life of your friends and relatives. But in order to keep up with others, people are literally forced to spend more and more time on sites like Instagram, which inevitably leads to addiction. And modern marketing strategies, unfortunately, contribute to this. For instance, youngsters, as the most sensitive part of society, almost immediately become obsessed and devote all their time to these sites, often paradoxically sacrificing real life.
Moreover, the popularity of social networking sites creates a high risk for individuals linked with the disclosure of a large amount of personal information. Most multimedia content is created and shared on sites such as Facebook with open identity and location data. Attackers can simply obtain it and commit a variety of crimes, from identity theft to bank fraud. Although people are aware of such security leaks, thousands of Australians become victims of scammers for billions of dollars every year.
To summarise, in spite of the obvious advantages of social networking sites, their detrimental effects should not be neglected. I firmly believe that due to addictive effects and security breaches these websites make life easier for scammers, and therefore have a mostly negative impact on our lives.
- Some people point out that experiential learning can work well in formal education However other think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high school or college 88
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 77
- Some people think children should be given the freedom to make their own individual choices while others believe constant supervision from parents is required Which position is closer to your own opinion Support your point of view with reasons and or exam 88
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 77
- In many towns and cities large shopping malls are replacing small local shops What is your opinion on this Do you think this is a positive development Use your own experiences 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth society as a whole and its members. To begin with, the transition of human i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n paradoxically sacrificing real life. Moreover, the popularity of social netwo...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs for billions of dollars every year. To summarise, in spite of the obvious ad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39115646259 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92206170872 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8758639963 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200728908263 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583336556366 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497213664012 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117209496148 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478062217412 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth society as a whole and its members. To begin with, the transition of human i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n paradoxically sacrificing real life. Moreover, the popularity of social netwo...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs for billions of dollars every year. To summarise, in spite of the obvious ad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39115646259 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92206170872 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8758639963 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200728908263 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583336556366 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497213664012 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117209496148 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478062217412 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.