Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?
Recently, the phenomenon of native regions affect and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that native regions and accomplished person influence can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, native regions can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both complicated procedures and this common phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, an accomplished person influence might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of too much hearing pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with complex issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of regions affect successful persons far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | maniram vicky | 65 | view |
- Some people point out that experimental learning can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experimental learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- Studying works of literature of a hundred years ago is a waste of time for students in today. Agree or disagree, give your reasons and examples. 36
- experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'procedures'' or 'procedure's'?
Suggestion: procedures'; procedure's
...sted by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is reg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74812030075 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19794023609 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4732311865 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195052281269 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06519763215 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795069379469 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115633703058 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743555419198 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.