The means of communicating in society today's has changed greatly over the last ten years. Give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in number of people who believing that society has changed greatly over the last ten years. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the means of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years can not only contribute to (sth/doing sth), but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of communicating in society today has changed greatly over the last ten years are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-09 | amolsharma44 | 77 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 11
- some countries have free health services However some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services 77
- some countries have free health services However some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services 72
- positive and negative effects of technology information through mass media 80
- Success in today s society is measure in term of wealthy To what extent do you agree with this definition of scuccess should take in to consideration 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87132352941 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77343106541 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5662098993 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329644052169 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136882218661 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183931769535 0.071462118173 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241966406159 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102442808184 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87132352941 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77343106541 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5662098993 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329644052169 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136882218661 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183931769535 0.071462118173 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241966406159 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102442808184 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.