Undoubtedly, in these days, there is a heated debate among people about increasing humans life expectancy and if it has a positive or negative impact to the society. While it is possible to accept medical technology improves every day; however, many would argue about the adaptability of such technological advancements. In this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument followed by a detailed conclusion.
At present, there are many people who are suffering from life threating conditions such as cancer. How does it feel to hear there is a cure for those illnesses? Well, it is now possible with the new research findings and many establishments all over the world do trials to find such cures. According to an article published by The Harvard University, it is revealed that human organs can now be printed with cutting-edge 3D printers. And that’s a game changer. As an example, person would have to wait until a matching donor is found when proceeding with a surgery, but with the advancement of medical technology it can get done within few minutes using a 3D printer.
There are some other people who believe trial and error would lead to loose human lives rather than saving them. And many would still consider aging is a natural process and no one would be able to reverse its effects. Also some would argue machines are not reliable and they are not willing to put their fate on machines.
In conclusion, while there are strong facts to support both sides of the argument, In my opinion I still accept that the medical technology can increase the life expectancy. I strongly recommend to organize awareness campaigns locally and nationally to raise awareness of medical technology.
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
- Communication has evolved significantly in the last decade. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 55
- With the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 85
- Some people say law can change human behaviour. Do you agree? 77
- Do you think extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc. are dangerous and should be prohibited? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ed debate among people about increasing humans life expectancy and if it has a positiv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...o believe trial and error would lead to loose human lives rather than saving them. An...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e would be able to reverse its effects. Also some would argue machines are not relia...
^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy can increase the life expectancy. I strongly recommend to organize awareness...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend organizing'.
Suggestion: recommend organizing
...crease the life expectancy. I strongly recommend to organize awareness campaigns locally and nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97909407666 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76778775028 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0982784615 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240239105184 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666244036286 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860489427878 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145003603582 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873350854544 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.