The More Important Invention
Recently, the phenomenon of revolutionary innovations and its corresponding effects has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this socio-economic development is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am highly inclined to believe that science and modern technologies like World Wide Web and integrated communications can be a pulse and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociology standpoint, electronic devices such as computer, internet, cell phone and video conference can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that saving time and efforts, as well as effective infrastructures, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered new inventions made our life easier and more convenient like education, entertainment and any type of job. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both higher standard of living and ameliorating people lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological sciences, this life-changing might increase the consequence of cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Moreover, fundamental aspects of suffering from obesity and overweight relate to this reality that the demerit of depression pertain to the feeling of social isolation and being alienated. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has arrested the downside of leading to poor eyesight is correlated negatively with the strain on eyes. Hence, it is corrected to presume the preconceived notion of this idea.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the global village far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of globalization prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint being initiative implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-31 | amin_mostafavi | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75170068027 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42692603051 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683673469388 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.439760286 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.916666667 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0426515202483 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0114435211514 0.0925447433944 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379538659398 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0202013856799 0.151781067708 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349898263809 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.