In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, the phenomenon of educational assessment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of examination methods is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that, practical assessment instead of examination can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, the theoretical examination can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that competitive as well as being irresponsible, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic experiment which discovered examination caused students become competitive and not to learn perfectly. Thus the beneficial consequences of both practical examination and learning apparently can be observed.
Within the realm of appraisal, writing assessment might exacerbate the consequences of learning. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of writing examination related to this reality that the demerit of inequality pertains to the standardization of exams. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the written exams correlated negatively with a sense of inequality in students. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of written assessment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical exams far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of this kind of assessment prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint written assessments implications.
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or 84
- Many people think that regions affect the successful person. What is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to? 88
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extend do you agree? 56
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...competitive and not to learn perfectly. Thus the beneficial consequences of both pra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...with a sense of inequality in students. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84790874525 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41708553664 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6193585384 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103940489268 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369863300783 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335220081497 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598386128672 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00843924374228 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.