Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of the parent legally responsibility for children’s act and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, this issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that children’s behavior can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, holding legally responsible for children’s act by parents can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated processes apparently can be seen.
Within a public arena, responsibility of parents about their children’s act might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of children’ behavior and holding regal responsibility by their parents on their act far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Effects of internet and social media on young people communication and forming language. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- In today’s world, different governments and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them? 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree? 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93307086614 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51555404143 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0667858693 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28210685789 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10453693151 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112652983672 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173188932623 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445395539326 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.