Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.

Essay topics:
Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.

Recently, parents' responsibility for their children has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question: Should parents be legally held responsible for their children's behavior? Whereas it is a widely held view that parents should not be forced legally to accept responsibility of their children's behavior, this essay will discuss why it is both positive and constructive.

To begin with, absence of parents' legal responsibility for children's behavior is bound up with neglecting parental supervision, which indicates they lead to children's unlawful and anti-social behaviours. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between parental liability and juvenile crime rate as well as adolescents' street crimes. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of children's misbehaviour is correlated positively with inadequate parental legal responsibility.

Within the realm of parenting, no legal penalty for parents against children's wrongdoings contributes to poor upbringing which in turn would come down to improperly shaping children's character as well as giving rise to children's aggressive behavior. A salient example of such attribution is minor crimes committed by young children, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take parental responsibility for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, sociologists might have had the opportunity to pinpoint inevitable behavioural problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of legal responsibility.

To conclude, parental liability for children's behaviours is a pragmatic solution to increase the proportion of children who will turn to law-abiding and sensible members of society in future.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...abiding and sensible members of society in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96616541353 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35795946926 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5685198355 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.7 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381325351135 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153042754271 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11522704323 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231989233016 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109494736464 0.0609392437508 180% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 12.6369458128 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.